Time and material contract (T&M)
In the United States, a time and material contract (T&M) is a type of construction contract that commits the client to pay the contractor based upon the time spent on the works, the materials used, as well as a mark-up for profit. In the UK, this type of contract is known as a cost reimbursable contract or cost plus.
This differs from a fixed price contract which commits the client to pay the contractor a lump sum fee for fulfilling the contract regardless of the amount on labour, materials, and so on used. A T&M contract is typically used on projects where it is difficult to describe the extent of the works required accurately, or where specifications and requirements are likely to change as the project progresses.
The main items that can be included in a T&M contract are:
- Labour rates: The amount that will be charged for the workforce, which may also include insurance, taxes, and so on.
- Material mark-up: It is usual for the client to be charged the retail price for materials and for a mark-up to be added by the contractor if they have a pre-agreed wholesale price with the supplier.
- Not-to-exceed: A guaranteed maximum price which places an upper limit on what the client can be charged by the contractor.
The advantages of using a T&M contract include:
- It provides the client with cost transparency and allows them to verify invoices and timesheets to ensure the costs are correct.
- It allows for greater flexibility in the extent of the works required.
- It allows works to progress even when there is no definitive plan for how it will be completed.
- It saves time in the initial estimating process which otherwise has to be done to a much higher level of detail and accuracy.
- Although there is generally a limit on their profit, the contractor can proceed knowing they are going to recover expenses with some profit, and so they can avoiding cost-cutting.
The disadvantages of using a T&M contract include:
- It can prove more risky for the client to proceed without a clear understanding of the final cost.
- It can increase the likelihood of disputes arising.
- Errors or inaccurate estimates can leave them with a low profit that may not be deemed worthwhile.
- It can necessitate more involvement from the client to ensure the contractor is motivated to progressing the works on time and within budget.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
Channel 4 broadcaster to host 125th anniversary ceremony.
Listed structures on the rail network
Heritage interests and operational requirements must be balanced.
Historic England publishes research into embodied carbon when retrofitting traditional buildings.
New Prime Minister delivers on ECA call for cut in electricity costs.
CIOB reacts to the announcement of Andy Burnham as Prime Minister.
Heritage and conservation science workforce survey - Have your say.
England's Suburbs 1820-2020. Book review.
New, more proportionate and targeted approach for higher-risk building assessments.
Government brings British Steel into public ownership.
UKCW Birmingham returns with bold new theme and focus.
New guidance published on competence requirements for self-certification schemes.
Construction Management, 8 July
NEETs crisis drives interest in trades, but apprenticeships barriers remain.

















